From Prophecy to Programming: Reclaiming Supersessionism from Zionist Dogma

Introduction: Stating My Purest Intentions

One day, after leaving the mental institution, my mother took me to the mall to buy clothes because the psychotropic drugs made me fat. I was still a virgin, striving hard to follow God’s commands, but I was getting older and starting to doubt if God was really going to bring me someone else who shared the same moral code, or if such a person could even exist.

I was standing outside of a Forever 21 store, and I put my head down because I was almost 22, and across from the store was an advertisement for the movie *The 40-Year-Old Virgin*. It’s funny in retrospect, but at that time I just wanted to kill myself.

John the Baptist was a man who was an outcast; he was not a guy who cared about material things or women. They called him a wild man; he ate honey and locusts, but at the end of his rope, right before he was about to be martyred, he called the disciples to ask if Jesus really was the one. Nobody wants to die in vain, even if you spend your whole life dedicated to an idea and sacrificing all that could have been for it.

I was a person who was terrified of going to Hell as a youth, the kind of person who, if I was going to do this faith thing, was going to do it right or not at all. I didn’t mix my wool with my cotton if that makes sense. So, I studied, and I studied, and the conclusion I came to was that God predestines some for Hell and some for glory.

Most people don’t like that, because it doesn’t make them feel good, including myself at the time, but predestination was the only logical way the scriptures made sense, and I’d rather believe the truth than live a lie, even if the truth might be painful or a hard pill to swallow. I mean, it’s only eternity, and it’s not like I had a whole lot to lose; I was a loser. Why not give my life to the one person who actually cared about me, which was God?

Through this journey of studying theology—I’m not going to bore you with all the details—I hit a lot of roadblocks, but in the end I found that the Bible was and is consistently right and perfect; it never contradicts. On the contrary, every word complements every other word over and over. It was my view, and the interpretation of the religious institutions, that was wrong.

This recent issue regarding Judaism is no different.

The realization I had is that the bloodline of the Jewish people ended a century after Christ’s death.

I have theological reasons to believe that the Jewish bloodline ended a century after Jesus’ death, which is what he meant when he said at the end of the age it was the end of the Jewish age.

Believe me when I say that I fear the Lord and contemplate my steps to put this information out there. I mean no harm to anyone, but I believe this could prevent the world from continuing in a very bad direction.

That is why I am writing.

---

Conditional Prophecy Vs Unconditional Prophecy

Conditional prophecy’s outcome depends on human action (repentance, obedience), serving as warnings or calls to change (like Nineveh);

unconditional prophecy is guaranteed regardless of human response, revealing God’s set plan, like the promise of restoration or the Messiah’s coming, building faith and hope. The core difference is human agency: conditional needs a response, while unconditional is God’s fixed decree, though even conditional ones show God’s interaction with free will.

It was 2104, and I had a terrible dream of the US getting hit with a dirty bomb. The radio in my dream said the bomb was dropped by Ukraine. When I told people about this, they said, “Are you sure you don’t mean Russia?” I said, “No, my dream said Ukraine; it was Ukraine who dropped the bomb.”

I had one friend who was former military who understood, and he showed me what was happening there with the US and NATO setting up a neo-Nazi proxy militia. I alerted everybody; as a result, I was gaslighted, had my life threatened, had my blogs and socials suspended and demonetized, and was doxxed on a hit list. At the time, I still believed that Nazis were bad. As I didn’t know the history of Ukraine and the Bolsheviks, I was confused why the liberal people were the ones beating the war drum, as in previous administrations they were perceived as the anti-war party. It wasn’t long before I saw that all the operatives on both sides, even the alt-right and far left, were jewish provocateurs.

Years and years go by; this friend of mine and I went through some crazy adventures and discoveries together; we had ups and downs in our friendship filled with paranoia and hysteria. Nearing the end of 2025, this friend came back into my life and asked me what timeline I thought we were living in.

Like a person who prepared for a test and had all the answers to the questions in front of them, I was unprepared to answer his question. Although I had the answer, I didn’t know how to articulate it simply.

Well, here’s the answer. I believe time is linear, and I believe he and I prevented that catastrophic event. (For now.) Life is no Marvel movie; there’s no multiverse here.

In the Bible there are things that are set in stone; I know this because of personal experiences I had wrestling literal angels and surviving when certain judgments were entered about me. I’ve experienced God’s compassion and know that if we humble ourselves even in judgment of our actions, God can change his mind and reverse the effect. Most could not understand this sort of thing, and that’s fine; I don’t expect many to understand or believe, but what I do hope the readers get out of this is an awakening to leave the Zionist programming instilled in them before it’s too late.

---

I was always confused about Luther’s book, The Jews and Their Lies. I almost thought it was a fake. But now, understanding the historical context of his time—and what happened in my own time, with my grandparents—it all makes perfect sense.

The core issue with the Church’s modern, geopolitical worship of Israel stems from how it has been trained to interpret prophecy.

When I was a boy, one of my grandmothers taught me Protestant theology through her post-World War II lens. She interpreted the four living creatures in Revelation as the four Axis allies. The theology books piled in her bedroom were all by Zionists. Hagee was her favorite.

If there was one thing all my grandparents—on both sides of my family—agreed on, it was this: the jewish people could do no wrong,

Fast forward to the present day, 2025. I don’t even believe they are really Jewish; I think they might believe they are jewish and/or are using it as an excuse to wipe out Europe for the destruction of the Second Temple, or jealousy, or whatever. I don’t know what they expect their endgame to be. Do they think some Iron Dome is going to save them, and they’re just going to rule over all the browns unharmed as if they won’t eventually find out the truth and surround them and break in?

---

A little side rant: I was part of many Bible studies led by people claiming to be Messianic jews. Before our group devolved into a Marxist hippie cult, the first book we read was Bonhoeffer’s Life Together. He’s the only Christian the media has ever called a prophet in my lifetime.

I remember going to the library during my quest to find the truth about free will versus predestination. I read Bonhoeffer’s thesis on the doctrine of justification through faith alone—written when he was allegedly a student under Karl Barth—and felt it was the most blasphemous work of Satan. It was as if Satan himself had written it for Bonhoeffer.

Now it makes perfect sense. That’s why they loved communism and hated Calvinism. That’s why they would gang up and mock me and the other Gentiles for being more masculine.

Patristic Era (Early Church Fathers)

This is where Supersessionism was formally established as the orthodox Christian position, primarily in response to Jewish-Christian debates.

• Justin Martyr (c. 100–165 AD): In his Dialogue with Trypho, he argues that the Church is the “true Israelite race” and that the old covenant is obsolete.

• Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202 AD): Saw the history of salvation as a progression, with the Church inheriting the promises made to Israel.

• Tertullian (c. 155–240 AD): Argued that the Jews had been rejected by God for their disobedience and that Christians were now the heirs.

• Origen (c. 184–253 AD): Used allegorical interpretation to spiritualize promises to Israel, applying them to the Church.

• Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD): Perhaps the most influential. He systematized the view that the Jews’ role was now as a “witness people”—preserving the Scriptures but living in a state of punishment and dispersion, while the Church is the “City of God” and the true inheritor of the covenant.

Medieval and Reformation Era

This view continued unchallenged as the Catholic norm and was inherited by the Protestant Reformers.

• Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274): The great scholastic theologian affirmed that the Old Covenant ceremonies were abolished and that the grace of Christ is now channeled through the Church.

• Martin Luther (1483–1546): As discussed, held a strong supersessionist view, which later turned violently anti-Judaic. (See previous answer.)

• John Calvin (1509–1564): A key figure for Reformed Covenant Theology. He taught a strong continuity between the Old and New Covenants, with one people of God (the Church) across both. He saw national Israel’s role as fulfilled and absorbed into the universal Church. His commentaries often interpret OT promises to Israel as being fulfilled spiritually in Christ and the Church.

• John Knox (c. 1514–1572): The Scottish Reformer followed Calvin’s covenant theology and supersessionist framework.

Modern & Contemporary Theologians (Pro-Supersessionism)

While challenged by Dispensationalism and various post-Holocaust theologies, Supersessionism remains a major position, especially in Reformed, Lutheran, and many mainline Protestant circles.

• Karl Barth (1886–1968): The towering 20th-century theologian rejected natural theology and any special status for ethnic Israel. For Barth, Jesus Christ is the one true Elect Man, and the community (Church) gathered around him is the elected people. Israel’s history is a witness to God’s judgment and grace, but it finds its sole meaning in pointing to Christ.

• Reformed/Covenant Theologians: Many prominent figures in this tradition maintain a form of supersessionism (often called “fulfillment theology” or “covenant continuity” by its proponents).

  • Louis Berkhof (1873–1957): His Systematic Theology is a standard text that presents a classic covenant theology view where the Church is the continuation of Israel.

  • John Murray (1898–1975): A key figure in 20th-century Reformed theology, he emphasized the unity of the covenant of grace.

  • Michael Horton (b. 1964): A contemporary systematic theologian who articulates a covenant theology that sees the Church as the multi-ethnic fulfillment of Abrahamic promises.

• Liberal & Mainline Protestant Theologians: Many figures in this tradition, influenced by historical criticism, see the Bible as a record of evolving human religious consciousness. They often view “Israel” as a theological concept (the people of God) fully realized in the universal, inclusive Christian community.

  • Rudolf Bultmann (1884–1976): Demythologized Scripture and saw the early Christian community as the true inheritor of God’s call.

• Roman Catholic Theology (Pre-Vatican II): The official position was firmly supersessionist for centuries, viewing the Church as the “New Israel.” Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate (1965) marked a significant shift, rejecting the label “deicide” for the Jewish people and affirming God’s enduring covenant with them, though the theological implications are still debated.

Important Distinction: “Hard” vs. “Soft” Supersessionism

Modern discussions often make a helpful distinction:

• Hard Supersessionism: God has utterly rejected and replaced Israel with the Church. Often accompanied by the view that Jews are no longer in any covenant relationship with God. (Common in Patristic and Reformation eras).

• Soft/Punitive Supersessionism: The Church is the fulfillment of Israel. God’s covenant with Israel has not been abrogated but has been expanded and transformed in Christ to include all nations in the Church. Ethnic Israel’s temporary “hardening” is for the inclusion of the Gentiles, but they remain beloved for the sake of the patriarchs (Romans 9-11 is key here). This is the dominant form among thoughtful Reformed theologians today. They argue they are not “replacing” Israel but recognizing its Messianic fulfillment in the multi-ethnic body of Christ.

Key Takeaway: Supersessionism is not a fringe view but a deeply rooted, systematic theological position with a long pedigree. Its strongest proponents today are primarily found within Reformed Covenant Theology and certain streams of Lutheran and mainline Protestant thought, though it is vigorously contested by Dispensationalists and proponents of “Dual Covenant” or “Pauline” views that see a future for ethnic Israel (Romans 11).

---

Venefica’s Enchantment: A Love Spelled in Blood

By Daniel Brummitt in Disruptive Romance <3

38 pages, published 8/13/2025

In a world where pride has poisoned men’s hearts, Venefica, a sorceress with lips like sin and a touch like salvation, knows the truth: a man’s greatest strength lies in his surrender. She is no common temptress—she is a witch who worships the humility of broken men, healing them with her devotion before claiming their souls in sacred ecstasy.

---