Your Car Can Keep Collecting Your Data After a Judge Dismissed a Privacy Lawsuit
But Here Are Simple Ways to Protect Yourself
The method used to intercept text messages and call logs in the context of the lawsuits against automakers appears to be through the vehicles' infotainment systems.
When car owners connect their phones to these systems, either via Bluetooth, USB, or other means, the infotainment system has access to certain data from the connected device.
Here’s a detailed look at how this process likely works:
Connection: Car owners connect their smartphones to the vehicle's infotainment system. This can be done through various methods such as Bluetooth, USB cable, or Wi-Fi. This connection allows the infotainment system to access the phone's functions, such as making calls or reading text messages.
Data Access: Once connected, the infotainment system can access certain types of data from the smartphone. This includes contact information, call logs, text messages, and sometimes even app data, depending on the permissions granted during the connection process.
Recording and Storage: The system can record and store this data locally on the vehicle's hardware or transmit it to remote servers controlled by the automaker. This data might include details like the content of text messages, timestamps, call duration, and more.
Data Transmission: Collected data may be sent to data hubs or servers for processing. Automakers use this data for various purposes, such as improving vehicle performance, enhancing user experience, and sometimes for marketing and analytics.
Interception: The term "interception" in this context means that the data is captured and stored without explicit consent or knowledge of the extent of data collection by the car owner. The legal contention is that this interception and recording of personal communications might violate privacy laws.
The controversy stems from whether this data collection constitutes a significant enough invasion of privacy to meet the statutory injury requirements of laws like the Washington Privacy Act.
Outrageously, the federal judge ruled that the mere collection and recording of this data, without more concrete allegations of harm, does not meet the threshold for a privacy violation under current law.
This decision leaves many frustrated and concerned about the lack of robust privacy protections in our legal system.
https://www.danielbrummitt.com/
"Decoding DAS:
Background The Data Analytical Services (DAS) Program, formerly recognized as the Hemisphere Project, stands as the most extensive telephone record collection initiative disclosed to date. Primarily financed through the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), DAS offers law enforcement personnel at local, state, and federal tiers acce…
GPS Trackers on Activists Car
GPS Trackers on Activists Car - On Monday August 1st, Michigan activist Peatmoss found 2 GPS tracking devises attached with powerful magnets to the rear axle of their car, see pictures here. This happened after Peatmoss spent a week hanging out with friends at the
Cracking the Code: Xfinity's Data Dilemma
In the ongoing battle over data discrepancies with Xfinity, customers are left pondering: is it MAC spoofing, foreign government interference, or outright fraud? Disruptive Fine Art is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.